Analysis of 12 angry men

Juror Four notes that the double jeopardy law would prevent that man from being retried for the same crime. Or what does this show?

He informs the jurors that they must find the defendant not guilty if there is a reasonable doubt that he is guilty. The availability of the switch knife shows that any number of people may have acquired a similar knife. The other jurors are offended when they think he is criticizing them for quickly, and therefore callously, sending the kid to his death — though of course their taking offense signals that it is likely true.

Most likely the extent of these feelings and the effect it has on his perceptions is unconscious to him. According to Kouzes and Posnerit is important to form such cooperative communities in an effort to achieve greatness within groups as well as organizations. Later, Nine will further discuss the concepts of truths and lies.

He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback. Right now I'm not sure if I believe this kid's story or not. He wants the kid to get a fair hearing in this jury room, for once in his life. Arriving at an unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily.

It is the size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men.

The Role of Group Dynamics: An Analysis of 12 Angry Men

He or she lays out the stakes: He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision. Ought he give in to the overwhelming popular opinion? Juror Three, acting the contrarian, responds that he feels fine.

His defenses start to crumble as his unconscious emotions become visible to him. There are gasps and a long silence. Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar.

Later in the play, Two is shown to be easily persuaded and influenced by persuasive language rather than facts. Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat.

In my experience, respectful listening and sincere consideration tends to influence others in the group in a similar manner. Seven hopes that they will already be in agreement. His life depends on their unanimous decision-either guilty or not guilty.

We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely affect the decision making process of some of the jurors. Kouzes and Posner further this idea: Is Eight being contrary for the sake of doing so? Nine is aloof, but polite.

Seven is preoccupied by entertainment; Eight listens silently, his physical isolation at the window foreshadowing his disagreement with the other jurors; Ten continues to show that he thinks of the kid as a member of a group that is different and ought to be looked down on.

Prejudice is defined as premature judgment or bias. Active Themes The Foreman then comments that he had a friend who wanted to be on the jury instead of him.

Because Three has a poor relationship with his son, he sees all young men as ungrateful and difficult. This domino effect led the group to cooperate as a community.The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive.

father. A jury of twelve men is locked in. Essay on Analysis Of The Film ' 12 Angry Men ' - The film “12 Angry Men”, produced inwas filmed in a New York City courthouse, with a majority of the filming taking place in the jury room. As the title of the film implies, all twelve of the main characters are men.

Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis

“Twelve Angry Men” – A Critical thinkers Argument analysis. The search for truth, does the end justify the means? Introduction.

12 Angry Men (1957)

The play and subsequent movie “Twelve Angry Men” is an examination of the dynamics at play in a jury room in the 50‟s in The United States.

The action revolves. LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twelve Angry Men, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work. Reflection of American Society Justice. 12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial.

12 Angry Men Essay

An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate. This is the case with Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men. In this story, originally published in the 's, the attitudes and beliefs of the jurors can .

Analysis of 12 angry men
Rated 3/5 based on 83 review